According to recent Hay Group research from more than 300 organizations across all industry sectors, planned 2011 base salary increases are at a median of 3 percent and reflect an uptick relative to March 2009, when salary increases were at a low point of 2 percent for most employee groups and zero percent for executives. After factoring in annualized Consumer Price Index growth for 2010 at 2 percent, the result is a real gain of 1 percent.

At the beginning of this decade, base salary increases were tracking between 4.5 percent and 5 percent and then at a steady 4 percent from 2005 to 2008. While the past three years have seen the lowest base salary increases that most employees have ever experienced, planned increases for 2011 are slightly higher versus last year and are consistent across executive, middle management, supervisory, and clerical positions and relatively consistent across most industry sectors.

The current economic outlook in the U.S. continues to cause most businesses to exercise caution in growing their fixed costs, including base salaries.

Those organizations that survived the immediate challenges of a deep and wide-reaching downturn have emerged to a changed landscape – one that’s more cost-conscious and performance-oriented.
`
Organizations are emerging from the recession leaner and focused on activities that offer the greatest returns; in other words, they’re working to ensure they don’t waste the opportunity a recession gives them to make needed changes. Difficult choices are being made as available money has to be earned via performance and allocated to those areas and people most critical to business success.

While the focus remains clearly on the bottom line, increased labor productivity and performance will be a core driver of profit growth going forward.
The performance-oriented, post-recession world in which organizations are operating has significant implications for line managers and talent management professionals.

Many organizations have a relentless focus on performance as they seek to reverse some of the sloppy performance management practices of past years.

Many organizations are emphasizing total reward programs – engaging employees in non-monetary ways via the development of more meaningful work experiences, clearer career paths, work-life balance programs, global mobility opportunities, targeted development opportunities, building better work climates and the like.

While there is not a significant change in pay increases for the coming year, the mix of that pay is changing. As organizations emerge from the recession, they are shifting more of their focus from fixed compensation (i.e., base salary) to variable pay, which includes all cash payments beyond base salary (i.e., short-term incentives, bonuses and long-term incentives), but does not include perks or benefits. Variable pay has proven to be an effective lever for motivating performance and reinforcing the focus of employees with the organization’s goals and priorities.

Many organizations are working harder than ever to align their reward, performance and business strategies – either because their business strategy has changed or because alignment to the business strategy was not already optimized. This means ensuring that the right performance metrics are used and that reward programs are closely tied to those metrics; performance and rewards are appropriately differentiated; supporting performance management processes are in place; and leaders have the capability and commitment to implement and communicate reward programs effectively.

So, while base salary increases aren’t as strong as they’ve been in the past 10 years, the opportunities for talent managers to think more creatively in motivating and engaging their organization’s talent is likely at an all-time high.
by Tom McMullen | Talent Management
[About the Author: Tom McMullen is North American reward leader for Hay Group.]
Related posts:




























Salaries is a big issues in Jobs
Edward Deming writing, about 14 points needed to transform management and the corporation, believed performance appraisal or pay for performance and bonuses were counterproductive and simply bad management. In his point #3 called – Evaluation of Performance, Merit Rating, or Annual Review- and he proposed their eradication. Deming writes, “The performance appraisal nourishes short-term performance, annihilates long-term planning, builds fear, demolishes teamwork, nourishes rivalry and politics… it leaves people bitter, crushed, bruised, battered, desolate, despondent, dejected, feeling inferior, some even depressed, unfit for work for weeks after receipt of rating, unable to comprehend why they are inferior. It is unfair, as it ascribes to the people in a group differences that may be caused totally by the system that they work in.” In other words, commitment is destroyed.
It is commonly understood that performance reviews, pay for performance, and incentive systems have little to do with the motivation, but they are successful in punishing employees and rupturing relationships. Many studies point out that rewards actually undermine the very process they are intended to enhance. In agreement, Deming believed that extrinsic motivators were a fallacy. When asked the question, “Is money a motivator?” he replied, “It is not!” He believed the same applies to all forms of extrinsic motivators, they do not motivate. When it comes to intrinsic motivation the relationship between reward and motivation is more complex. For example, offering rewards for easy tasks or just completing a task may lower intrinsic motivation. It is a mistake to assume that employees are motivated in predictable ways by differential rewards and punishments.
Thanks czander thanks for your comment on our post that was really well describe and will written comment i hope u continuous visiting our site and provide us suitable comments if you have any content articles which u want to publish and prompt then we are welcome you to publish on our website you can contact us @ writeforhr@gmail.com, contact@writeforhr.com and if u have any further questions and comments please shear with us
OK that makes a lot of sense dude.
http://www.anonymize.it.tc
Point 1-The purpose of an organization is to allow ordinary people to do extraordinary things. Point 2- Happiness is loving what you do and then selling that love. Point 3- Learn to love what you have, not what you want. Point 4- I rembember when the Japanese were in th US meeting in an auditorium with the head honchos of the state, County and City…purpose was to seek out potential new automotive manufacturing facility; there first question was what are the peoples hearts like here…….I knew what they were wondering but the others looked at each other wondering why they asked that question. Last Point- A reasonable salary is fine, but security and benefits are extra fine for potential employees and retention of existing employees….profit sharing to the highest max
Cars and houses are not cheap and not every person is able to buy it. But, mortgage loans are invented to support people in such kind of cases.